From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751935AbWFLMzB (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:55:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751936AbWFLMzB (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:55:01 -0400 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:21448 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751935AbWFLMzA (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:55:00 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Jan Engelhardt Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Adding a counter in vma to indicate the number of physical pages backing it Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:54:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: Arjan van de Ven , rohitseth@google.com, Andrew Morton , Linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1149903235.31417.84.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> <200606121317.44139.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606121454.34072.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 12 June 2006 14:49, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > >I agree it's a bad idea. smaps is only a debugging kludge anyways > >and it's not a good idea to we bloat core data structures for it. > > > Is there a way to disable it (smaps), then? Just don't use it? Not set CONFIG_NUMA? -Andi