From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964831AbWFNATz (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:19:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932372AbWFNATz (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:19:55 -0400 Received: from relay01.pair.com ([209.68.5.15]:46600 "HELO relay01.pair.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932371AbWFNATy (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:19:54 -0400 X-pair-Authenticated: 71.197.50.189 From: Chase Venters To: Matt Helsley Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] Task watchers: Task Watchers Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:19:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux-Kernel , Jes Sorensen , LSE-Tech , Chandra S Seetharaman , Alan Stern , John T Kohl , Balbir Singh , Shailabh Nagar , Christoph Hellwig References: <20060613235122.130021000@localhost.localdomain> <1150242810.21787.140.camel@stark> In-Reply-To: <1150242810.21787.140.camel@stark> Organization: Clientec, Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606131919.52364.chase.venters@clientec.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 13 June 2006 18:53, Matt Helsley wrote: > @@ -847,12 +848,15 @@ static void exit_notify(struct task_stru > fastcall NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long code) > { > struct task_struct *tsk = current; > struct taskstats *tidstats, *tgidstats; > int group_dead; > + int notify_result; > > profile_task_exit(tsk); > + tsk->exit_code = code; > + notify_result = notify_watchers(WATCH_TASK_EXIT, tsk); Are you using this specific return value? > +int notify_watchers(unsigned long val, void *v) > +{ > + return atomic_notifier_call_chain(&task_watchers, val, v); > +} Might this be called notify_task_watchers()? Thanks, Chase