* [patch 2/24] s390: incomplete stack traces.
@ 2006-06-14 13:58 Martin Schwidefsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2006-06-14 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, heiko.carstens
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
[S390] incomplete stack traces.
show_stack() passes a pointer to the current stack frame to show_trace().
Because of tail call optimization the pointer doesn't point to the original
stack frame anymory and therefore traces are wrong. Don't pass the pointer
of the current stack frame to show_trace(). Instead let show_trace()
calculate the pointer on its own.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kernel/traps.c | 8 +++-----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff -urpN linux-2.6/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c linux-2.6-patched/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c
--- linux-2.6/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c 2006-03-20 06:53:29.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6-patched/arch/s390/kernel/traps.c 2006-06-14 14:29:32.000000000 +0200
@@ -150,13 +150,11 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task
unsigned long *stack;
int i;
- // debugging aid: "show_stack(NULL);" prints the
- // back trace for this cpu.
-
if (!sp)
- sp = task ? (unsigned long *) task->thread.ksp : __r15;
+ stack = task ? (unsigned long *) task->thread.ksp : __r15;
+ else
+ stack = sp;
- stack = sp;
for (i = 0; i < kstack_depth_to_print; i++) {
if (((addr_t) stack & (THREAD_SIZE-1)) == 0)
break;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-06-14 13:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-14 13:58 [patch 2/24] s390: incomplete stack traces Martin Schwidefsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox