Re: [RFC] Slimming down struct inode

Nathan Scott
2006-06-13T22:42:35Z

On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:00:59PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Such a change would would indeed break XFS, in exactly the way you

Oh, I should clarify - the suggestion of using sb->s_blocksize/
s_blocksize_bits was what I meant by "would break XFS".

> > suggest Jan - the realtime subvolume does typically use a different
> > blocksize from the data subvolume (the realtime extent size is used,
> > and this can be set per-inode too), and there would now be no way to
> > distinguish this preferred IO size difference.
>
> It can be made into an inode operation:

*nod* - that'd work fine for our needs here.

cheers.

--
Nathan