From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751109AbWFRHTN (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 03:19:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751115AbWFRHTM (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 03:19:12 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:45697 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751109AbWFRHTL (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 03:19:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:48:47 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Sam Vilain Cc: Nick Piggin , Kirill Korotaev , Mike Galbraith , Ingo Molnar , Peter Williams , Andrew Morton , sekharan@us.ibm.com, Balbir Singh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maeda.naoaki@jp.fujitsu.com, kurosawa@valinux.co.jp Subject: Re: [RFC] CPU controllers? Message-ID: <20060618071847.GA4988@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@in.ibm.com References: <20060615134632.GA22033@in.ibm.com> <4493C1D1.4020801@yahoo.com.au> <20060617164812.GB4643@in.ibm.com> <4494DF50.2070509@yahoo.com.au> <4494EA66.8030305@vilain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4494EA66.8030305@vilain.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 05:53:42PM +1200, Sam Vilain wrote: > Bear in mind that we have on the table at least one group of scheduling > solutions (timeslice scaling based ones, such as the VServer one) which > is virtually no overhead and could potentially provide the "jumpers" > necessary for implementing more complex scheduling policies. Sam, Do you have any plans to post the vserver CPU control implementation hooked against maybe Resource Groups (for grouping tasks)? Seeing several different implementation against current kernel may perhaps help maintainers decide what they like and what they don't? -- Regards, vatsa