From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932172AbWFRI7z (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 04:59:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932175AbWFRI7z (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 04:59:55 -0400 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:47074 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932172AbWFRI7y (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 04:59:54 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.16-rc6-mm2] x86: add NUMA to oops messages Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 10:59:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: linux-kernel , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven References: <200606180415_MC3-1-C2C5-AF7A@compuserve.com> In-Reply-To: <200606180415_MC3-1-C2C5-AF7A@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606181059.44576.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 18 June 2006 10:13, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > Add "NUMA" to x86 oops printouts to help with debugging. Use vermagic.h > defines to clean up the code, suggested by Arjan van de Ven. I don't see any particular value in printing NUMA here, and putting half of .config into the oops doesn't seem like a good long term strategy. -Andi