public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org, vojtech@suse.cz
Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu()
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:21:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606191021.03631.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060618171511.e0e6de26.pj@sgi.com>

On Monday 19 June 2006 02:15, Paul Jackson wrote:

>
> Roughly, he was looking to support something resembling the kernel's
> per-cpu data in userland library code for high performance scientific
> number crunching, for things like statistics gathering and perhaps (not
> sure of this) reduce locking costs.

While vgetcpu() can be used for this most likely glibc TLS is already 
good enough for this. So it will help, but I don't think it's the primary
motivation.

> I see "x86-64" in the Subject.  I don't see why this facility is
> arch-specific.  Could it work on any arch, ia64 being the one of
> interest to me?

The implementation is x86-64 specific and optimized for x86-64. You could 
probably implement something with the same prototype for IA64 too,
although the internal implementation will likely be very different
(there is nothing x86-64 specific in the prototype) 

AFAIK ia64 supports fast system calls so it might be possible to 
do a simple implementation without vsyscalls.

> I have some ignorance on your references to "CPUID(1)".  I don't recall
> what it is.  The only command so named I find on my systems are a

CPUID 1 is a x86 instruction that is one way to implement a user level
vgetcpu on x86.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-19  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-14  7:42 FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu() Andi Kleen
2006-06-14 10:47 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-14 14:54 ` Steve Munroe
2006-06-15 23:17   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
     [not found] ` <449029DB.7030505@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <200606141752.02361.ak@suse.de>
2006-06-14 16:30     ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-06-14 17:34       ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2006-06-15 18:44 ` Tony Luck
2006-06-16  6:22   ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16  7:23     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2006-06-16  7:37       ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16  9:48     ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 10:09       ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 11:02         ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 11:17           ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 11:58             ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 12:36               ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 12:41                 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-16 12:48                   ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 21:04                     ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 14:56                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:31                   ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-16 15:37                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 15:58                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 16:24                         ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 16:33                           ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-06-16 21:12                     ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 15:36                   ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-16 15:40                     ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 21:15                       ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 21:19                       ` Chase Venters
2006-06-16 23:40                         ` Brent Casavant
2006-06-17  6:58                           ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-17  6:55                         ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2006-06-19  8:42                           ` Zoltan Menyhart
2006-06-19  8:54                             ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-16 14:54               ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-20  8:28                 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-06-19  0:15 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-19  8:21   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-06-19 10:09     ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-21  1:18     ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-21  1:21       ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200606191021.03631.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox