From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964930AbWFSWCo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:02:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964931AbWFSWCo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:02:44 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:57787 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964930AbWFSWCn (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:02:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:05:47 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Heiko Carstens Cc: mingo@elte.hu, arjan@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [patch 8/8] lock validator: add s390 to supported options Message-Id: <20060619150547.0b6213b1.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060614142503.GI1241@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <20060614142503.GI1241@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Heiko Carstens wrote: > > config DEBUG_SPINLOCK_ALLOC > bool "Spinlock debugging: detect incorrect freeing of live spinlocks" > - depends on DEBUG_SPINLOCK && X86 > + depends on DEBUG_SPINLOCK && (X86 || S390) Can we please stomp this out before it starts to look like CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER? We should define CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_LOCKDEP down in arch/[i386|x86_64|s390]/Kconfig and use that in lib/Kconfig.debug.