From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932097AbWFSUuj (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:50:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932221AbWFSUuj (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:50:39 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:18869 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932097AbWFSUui (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:50:38 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Object reclaim via the slab allocator V1 Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:50:29 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg , Marcelo Tosatti , "Paul E. McKenney" , Nick Piggin , Theodore Tso , Dave Chinner References: <20060619184651.23130.62875.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20060619184651.23130.62875.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606192250.30428.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 19 June 2006 20:46, Christoph Lameter wrote: > We currently have a set of problem with slab reclaim: [...] Very cool. We discussed something like that forever but it's great that finally someone implements it. -Andi