From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965009AbWFTIOG (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:14:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965069AbWFTIOG (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:14:06 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59264 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965009AbWFTIOF (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:14:05 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:13:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: Jeff Garzik , Dave Olson , Brice Goglin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Lindahl , gregkh@suse.de References: <200606200925.30926.ak@suse.de> <4497ABAC.4030305@garzik.org> In-Reply-To: <4497ABAC.4030305@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606201013.51564.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 20 June 2006 10:02, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > So if there are any more MSI problems comming up IMHO it should be white list/disabled > > by default and only turn on after a long time when Windows uses it by default > > or something. Greg, do you agree? > > > We should be optimists, not pessimists. Yes, booting on all systems is overrated anyways, isn't it? > > MSI is useful enough that we should turn it on by default in newer systems. That is what we've tried so far and it seems to not work. -Andi