From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751366AbWFTQBa (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:01:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751364AbWFTQBa (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:01:30 -0400 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:4797 "EHLO palinux.external.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751367AbWFTQB3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:01:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:01:28 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Matt LaPlante Cc: "'Roman Zippel'" , "'Linus Torvalds'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unify CONFIG_LBD and CONFIG_LSF handling Message-ID: <20060620160128.GL1630@parisc-linux.org> References: <000601c69481$a9f86c40$fe01a8c0@cyberdogt42> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000601c69481$a9f86c40$fe01a8c0@cyberdogt42> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:53:24AM -0400, Matt LaPlante wrote: > > How likely is it that someone who doesn't understand the question needs > > this option? I think N is a safe answer here. > > This is the impression I had as well. Even if you disagree though, I was > equally confused by the fact that if we say to answer Y as default, why is > the kconfig default already N? The *default* is N as that's the answer most people want. The *safe* answer is Y as it won't prevent you from getting access to your data. Makes sense?