public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Brice Goglin <brice@myri.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] PCI extended conf space when MMCONFIG disabled because of e820
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:19:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060621151942.A17228@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4491029D.4060002@linux.intel.com>; from arjan@linux.intel.com on Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:47:57PM -0700

On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:47:57PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> > We need to improve this "mmconfig disabled" anyhow. Having the extended
> > config space unavailable on lots of machines is also far from a viable
> > solution :)
> 
> it's unlikely to be many machines though.
> 
I just noticed today - this check killed PCI Express on 3 of the 4
machines I normally use for testing. Digging a bit deeper, I found
this in the PCI firmware spec (v 3.0):

If the operating system does not natively comprehend reserving the
MMCFG region, the MMCFG region must be reserved by firmware. The
address range reported in the MCFG table or by _CBA method (see
Section 4.1.3) must be reserved by declaring a motherboard resource.
For most systems, the motherboard resource would appear at the root
of the ACPI namespace (under \_SB) in a node with a _HID of EISAID
(PNP0C02), and the resources in this case should not be claimed in
the root PCI bus.s _CRS. The resources can optionally be returned in
Int15 E820 or EFIGetMemoryMap as reserved memory but must always be
reported through ACPI as a motherboard resource

Sure enough, the ACPI namespace for the "broken" machines lists
the MMCFG resources as indicated above, and PCI Express works fine
otherwise. I haven't looked yet whether it's possible to add this
check in the code, have you looked into that option? I understand
the PCI firmware spec is not necessarily the final authority on
this, but a _lot_ of BIOS developers read that to figure out what
to do...

Rajesh

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-21 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-14 21:07 [RFC] PCI extended conf space when MMCONFIG disabled because of e820 Brice Goglin
2006-06-14 21:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-15  1:45   ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-15  1:57   ` Brice Goglin
2006-06-15  6:47     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-21 22:19       ` Rajesh Shah [this message]
2006-06-21 22:32         ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-22  0:15           ` Rajesh Shah
2006-06-22  9:27             ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-23  7:41               ` Rajesh Shah
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-15  8:41 Chuck Ebbert
2006-06-15 13:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-15 14:32   ` Barry Scott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060621151942.A17228@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=rajesh.shah@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brice@myri.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox