From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: marcelo@kvack.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pageexec@freemail.hu
Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: another fix for canonical RIPs during signal handling
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:06:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060622210657.GA1221@1wt.eu> (raw)
I've been reported by the PaX Team that the following fix left a
small hole :
[PATCH] Always check that RIPs are canonical during signal handling
+ if (regs->rip >= TASK_SIZE && regs->rip < VSYSCALL_START) {
+ regs->rip = 0;
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
...
+ if (regs->rip >= TASK_SIZE) {
+ if (sig == SIGSEGV)
+ ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
+ regs->rip = 0;
+ }
"the wrong part is regs->rip=0, i guess the intention was to cause a
SIGSEGV upon returning to userland, but 0 is a valid userland address,
an application may very well have something mapped there. the correct
value would be ~0UL as it's guaranteed to fault on linux."
This explanation makes sense, so here's the patch. Andi, would you please
review and confirm ? Thanks in advance.
Acked-By: Pax Team
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
---
arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
a408e3e80854d04915969fe3ae05152bedf99c79
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c
index 8bc844f..f3eff11 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ #define COPY(x) err |= __get_user(regs-
COPY(rdx); COPY(rcx);
COPY(rip);
if (regs->rip >= TASK_SIZE && regs->rip < VSYSCALL_START) {
- regs->rip = 0;
+ regs->rip = ~0UL; /* force the application to fault */
return -EFAULT;
}
COPY(r8);
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ #endif
if (regs->rip >= TASK_SIZE) {
if (sig == SIGSEGV)
ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
- regs->rip = 0;
+ regs->rip = ~0UL; /* force the application to fault */
}
regs->cs = __USER_CS;
regs->ss = __USER_DS;
--
1.3.3
next reply other threads:[~2006-06-22 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-22 21:06 Willy Tarreau [this message]
2006-06-22 21:26 ` [PATCH] x86_64: another fix for canonical RIPs during signal handling Andi Kleen
2006-06-22 21:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-06-22 22:17 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <449BC808.4174.277D15CF@pageexec.freemail.hu>
2006-06-23 12:29 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <449C0616.4382.286F7C8C@pageexec.freemail.hu>
2006-06-23 13:32 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-06-23 13:46 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-23 13:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-06-23 14:51 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060622210657.GA1221@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@kvack.org \
--cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox