public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2.4.33-rc1] updated patch kit for gcc-4.1.1
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:24:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060622212400.GA2388@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060622164138.GI9111@stusta.de>

Hi Adrian,

On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 06:41:38PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:38:24PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi Mikael,
> > 
> > On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 10:52:05PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > An updated patch kit allowing gcc-4.1.1 to compile the 2.4.33-rc1 kernel is now available:
> > > <http://user.it.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/patches/2.4/patch-gcc4-fixes-v15-2.4.33-rc1>
> > > 
> > > Changes since the previously announced version of the patch kit
> > > <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=114149697417107&w=2>:
> > > 
> > > - Merged the fixes for gcc-4.1 into the baseline patch kit for gcc-4.0.
> > > - I previously reported that gcc-4.1.0 built ppc32 kernels that oopsed
> > >   in shrink_dcache_parent(). gcc-4.1.1 fixed this issue.
> > > - The architectures known to work in kernel 2.4.33-rc1 + this patch kit
> > >   with gcc-4.1.1 and gcc-4.0.3 are i386, x86-64, and ppc32.
> > 
> > Thanks for still maintaining this patchset. I sometimes have coworkers
> > complain that they cannot build 2.4 anymore because they have let their
> > distro automatically upgarde gcc to 4.x. I will be able to point your
> 
> Which distribution does both support kernel 2.4 and no longer ship a 
> compiler capable of compiling kernel 2.4?

It's not that they no longer ship it, it's that when they're not careful
enough about their updates an rely on the "testing" tree, they get their
compiler automatically upgraded to 4.0. At least from what I've been told,
since I don't use this distro myself. They always have the option to reinstall
an older one but it's not intuitive to them at first glance. Fortunately,
there's a clear error message now.

Regards,
Willy


  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-22 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-17 20:52 [patch 2.4.33-rc1] updated patch kit for gcc-4.1.1 Mikael Pettersson
2006-06-17 21:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-06-22 16:41   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-06-22 21:24     ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-17 23:04 Mikael Pettersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060622212400.GA2388@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox