From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>,
Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>,
Kevin Anderson <kanderso@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GFS2 and DLM
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:54:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060623155444.GA5504@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1151078044.3856.1595.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com>
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 04:54:04PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> with just calling permission directly... we need to call it mainly because
> the VFS only does locking within a single node and we recheck the permissions
> in a few places after we've taken the glocks which provide cluster-wide
> exclusion.
->permission must give correct answers. So I think the answer to your question
is that you need to do the right thing there and get rid of the additional
calls.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-23 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-20 12:17 GFS2 and DLM Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-20 12:32 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 12:47 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-20 14:04 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 15:40 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-20 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21 11:20 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 14:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-26 21:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-20 12:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-20 12:55 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-20 15:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-23 14:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 20:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-26 20:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-26 20:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-27 7:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 6:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 6:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-27 7:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 7:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-27 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 8:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-27 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 9:23 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 13:40 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-27 8:16 ` Nathan Scott
2006-06-27 8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 8:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-06-27 10:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 8:42 ` Nathan Scott
2006-06-27 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-23 14:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 15:54 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 15:54 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2006-06-23 16:09 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 14:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 15:26 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 16:29 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 16:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-26 20:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 7:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-27 8:31 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060623155444.GA5504@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kanderso@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pcaulfie@redhat.com \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox