From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932611AbWF0HMP (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 03:12:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932616AbWF0HMO (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 03:12:14 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:7350 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932549AbWF0HML (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 03:12:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 09:07:20 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Steven Whitehouse , Linus Torvalds , David Teigland , Patrick Caulfield , Kevin Anderson , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GFS2 and DLM Message-ID: <20060627070720.GA29949@elte.hu> References: <1150805833.3856.1356.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> <20060623144928.GA32694@infradead.org> <20060626200300.GA15424@elte.hu> <20060627063339.GA27938@elte.hu> <1151390601.2879.16.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1151390601.2879.16.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: -3.1 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-3.1 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > Btw., i have just taken a 5 minute tour into XFS, and i found at > > least 5 other problems with the XFS code that are similar in nature > > to the ones you pointed out. > > that's no reason to merge even more junk the GFS2 ones were immediately addressed, 28 minutes and 27 seconds after they were pointed out: Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:57:56 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: GFS2 and DLM Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:26:23 +0100 From: Steven Whitehouse Subject: Re: GFS2 and DLM > > (mostly useless wrappers around Linux functionality) Isnt this whole > > episode highly hypocritic to begin with? > > lets not start calling names please... well, i guess it's way too late for that: > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Did anyone actually bother to review it? It's huge and was in > > > pretty bad shapre when I looked last time. Also in the -mm merge > > > writeup you guys said it's only scheduled for 2.6.19 so I didn't > > > even bother looking at the huge mess. :-) Ingo