public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>,
	Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>,
	Kevin Anderson <kanderso@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GFS2 and DLM
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:22:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060627082240.GA672@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060627181632.A1297906@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>


* Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com> wrote:

> >           */
> >          buf = (xfs_caddr_t) kmem_zalloc(NBPP, KM_SLEEP);
> >  [...]
> > 
> > where kmem_zalloc() may fail!!!
> 
> Not with the flags it was given.

yeah, you are right - sorry about that.

XFS instead loops infinitely:

 void *
 kmem_alloc(size_t size, unsigned int __nocast flags)
 {
         int     retries = 0;
         gfp_t   lflags = kmem_flags_convert(flags);
         void    *ptr;

         do {
                 if (size < MAX_SLAB_SIZE || retries > MAX_VMALLOCS)
                         ptr = kmalloc(size, lflags);
                 else
                         ptr = __vmalloc(size, lflags, PAGE_KERNEL);
                 if (ptr || (flags & (KM_MAYFAIL|KM_NOSLEEP)))
                         return ptr;
                 if (!(++retries % 100))
                         printk(KERN_ERR "XFS: possible memory allocation "
                                         "deadlock in %s (mode:0x%x)\n",
                                         __FUNCTION__, lflags);
                 blk_congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/50);
         } while (1);
 }

which is in essence an open-coded GFP_NOFAIL implementation. Here's what 
__GFP_NOFAIL does:

                        if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
                                blk_congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/50);
                                goto nofail_alloc;
                        }

and since XFS makes use of KM_SLEEP in 130+ callsites, that means it is 
in essence using GFP_NOFAIL massively!

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-27  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-20 12:17 GFS2 and DLM Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-20 12:32 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 12:47   ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-20 14:04     ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 15:40       ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-20 19:55         ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21 11:20       ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 14:45       ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-26 21:03         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27  7:52           ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-20 12:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-20 12:55   ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-20 15:55   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-23 14:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 20:46   ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-26 20:03   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-26 20:12     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-27  7:08       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27  6:33     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27  6:43       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-27  7:07         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27  7:06       ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-27  8:35         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27  8:50           ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-27  9:04             ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27  9:23               ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 13:40           ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-27  8:16       ` Nathan Scott
2006-06-27  8:22         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-06-27  8:41           ` Pekka Enberg
2006-06-27 10:33             ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27  8:42           ` Nathan Scott
2006-06-27  8:51             ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-23 14:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 15:54   ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 15:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 16:09       ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 14:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 15:26   ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 16:29   ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 16:48     ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-26 20:58       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27  7:50         ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-27  8:31           ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060627082240.GA672@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kanderso@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathans@sgi.com \
    --cc=pcaulfie@redhat.com \
    --cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=teigland@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox