From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161217AbWF1I5m (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:57:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161240AbWF1I5m (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:57:42 -0400 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:28391 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161217AbWF1I5m (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:57:42 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [RFC, patch] i386: vgetcpu(), take 2 Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:53:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: Ingo Molnar , 76306.1226@compuserve.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, drepper@redhat.com, roland@redhat.com, jakub@redhat.com References: <200606210329_MC3-1-C305-E008@compuserve.com> <20060621081539.GA14227@elte.hu> <20060627224433.fb726e0c.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20060627224433.fb726e0c.pj@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606281053.15681.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 28 June 2006 07:44, Paul Jackson wrote: > > but my gut feeling is that we should add a proper sys_get_cpu() syscall > > Yes - this should be for more or less all arch's. The whole point of the original implementation is to do a fast architecture specific call. A slow generic call isn't very useful. -Andi