From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750928AbWF1Sla (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:41:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750824AbWF1Sla (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:41:30 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:8155 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750935AbWF1Sl3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:41:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:40:23 -0500 From: Michael Halcrow To: akpm@osdl.org Cc: Adrian Bunk , Phillip Hellewell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [-mm patch] fs/ecryptfs/: possible cleanups Message-ID: <20060628184023.GF14557@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: Michael Halcrow References: <20060627015211.ce480da6.akpm@osdl.org> <20060628165525.GG13915@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060628165525.GG13915@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:55:25PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This patch contains the following possible cleanups: > - make needlessly global functions static > - there's usually no reason for functions in C files to be marked as > inline - gcc usually knows best whether or not to inline a function > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk Acked-by: Michael Halcrow