public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Move export symbols to their C functions
       [not found] <200606261902.k5QJ2R93008443@hera.kernel.org>
@ 2006-06-28 19:38 ` Dave Jones
  2006-06-28 19:52   ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2006-06-28 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: ak

On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 07:02:27PM +0000, Linux Kernel wrote:
 > commit 2ee60e17896c65da1df5780d3196c050bccb7d10
 > tree 54b41b23c92a79e44c7f27c697c84c64052cb85d
 > parent 45486f81c9aa07218b73a38cbcf62ffa66e99088
 > author Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:59:44 +0200
 > committer Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:48:22 -0700
 > 
 > [PATCH] x86_64: Move export symbols to their C functions
 > 
 > Only exports for assembler files are left in x8664_ksyms.c
 > 
 > -
 > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_nmi_callback);
 > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unset_nmi_callback);

These two exports were never re-added, which broke modular oprofile.

Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

--- linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/kernel/nmi.c~	2006-06-28 15:35:34.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/kernel/nmi.c	2006-06-28 15:36:12.000000000 -0400
@@ -607,11 +607,13 @@ void set_nmi_callback(nmi_callback_t cal
 	vmalloc_sync_all();
 	rcu_assign_pointer(nmi_callback, callback);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_nmi_callback);
 
 void unset_nmi_callback(void)
 {
 	nmi_callback = dummy_nmi_callback;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unset_nmi_callback);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
 

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Move export symbols to their C functions
  2006-06-28 19:38 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Move export symbols to their C functions Dave Jones
@ 2006-06-28 19:52   ` Andi Kleen
  2006-06-28 19:56     ` Dave Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-06-28 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Jones; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List


> These two exports were never re-added, which broke modular oprofile.

Everybody and their dog sent patches for that by now and I assume
Linus already merged Andrew's version

-Andi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Move export symbols to their C functions
  2006-06-28 19:52   ` Andi Kleen
@ 2006-06-28 19:56     ` Dave Jones
  2006-06-28 20:13       ` Dave Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2006-06-28 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:52:20PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
 > 
 > > These two exports were never re-added, which broke modular oprofile.
 > 
 > Everybody and their dog sent patches for that by now and I assume
 > Linus already merged Andrew's version

Ah, didn't see them, and my tree seems to be stale.
Yes, looks fixed.

		Dave
-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Move export symbols to their C functions
  2006-06-28 19:56     ` Dave Jones
@ 2006-06-28 20:13       ` Dave Jones
  2006-06-28 20:31         ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2006-06-28 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:56:32PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:52:20PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
 >  > 
 >  > > These two exports were never re-added, which broke modular oprofile.
 >  > 
 >  > Everybody and their dog sent patches for that by now and I assume
 >  > Linus already merged Andrew's version
 > 
 > Ah, didn't see them, and my tree seems to be stale.
 > Yes, looks fixed.

Actually, I take that back, I was looking at the wrong tree (again).
It's not fixed in Linus tree yet in a git pull from a few minutes ago.

Anyone else notice that head-commits is also really slow ?
Lately I get commit mails from 12-24hrs earlier from it.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Move export symbols to their C functions
  2006-06-28 20:13       ` Dave Jones
@ 2006-06-28 20:31         ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-06-28 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Jones; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Wednesday 28 June 2006 22:13, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:56:32PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>  > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:52:20PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>  >  > 
>  >  > > These two exports were never re-added, which broke modular oprofile.
>  >  > 
>  >  > Everybody and their dog sent patches for that by now and I assume
>  >  > Linus already merged Andrew's version
>  > 
>  > Ah, didn't see them, and my tree seems to be stale.
>  > Yes, looks fixed.
> 
> Actually, I take that back, I was looking at the wrong tree (again).
> It's not fixed in Linus tree yet in a git pull from a few minutes ago.

At least Andrew has already sent the patch. I assume it will
get in if it hasn't already.

-Andi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-28 20:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <200606261902.k5QJ2R93008443@hera.kernel.org>
2006-06-28 19:38 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Move export symbols to their C functions Dave Jones
2006-06-28 19:52   ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-28 19:56     ` Dave Jones
2006-06-28 20:13       ` Dave Jones
2006-06-28 20:31         ` Andi Kleen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox