From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750918AbWF2LgP (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 07:36:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751484AbWF2LgP (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 07:36:15 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:64704 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750930AbWF2LgO (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 07:36:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:42:37 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Daniel Walker Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NO_HZ Kconfig rework Message-ID: <20060629094231.GA2009@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200606261616.k5QGGbem016569@dwalker1.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200606261616.k5QGGbem016569@dwalker1.mvista.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 2006-06-26 09:16:37, Daniel Walker wrote: > I got NO_HZ working on ARM, but because the ARM tree already > extensively implements NO_IDLE_HZ I had to make NO_HZ a > completely seprate option. So... what is the difference between NO_HZ and NO_IDLE_HZ? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html