public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Prasanna Panchamukhi <prasanna@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.17-rt1 : fix x86_64 oops
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:32:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060629163236.GD1294@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060629142442.GA11546@elte.hu>

On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 04:24:42PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > OK, I need to catch up, but I see a lot of oops while running 
> > rcutorture in my box (rt1). I am investigating this atm.
> 
> fyi, 2.6.17-mm4 throws tons of these:
> 
>  BUG: scheduling while atomic: rcu_torture_rea/0x00010000/1471
>   [<c0106123>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
>   [<c010613d>] dump_stack+0x17/0x1a
>   [<c123b4e2>] schedule+0x61/0xc61
>   [<c015f380>] rcu_torture_reader+0x12e/0x17e
>   [<c014101f>] kthread+0xc4/0xf0
>   [<c0102005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb

Probably the fault of my new ops-ization of rcutorture.c.  :-/
(For whatever it is worth, Dipankar would still be using the older
non-ops-ized version of rcutorture.c.)

Did you get these oopses with default setting of torture_type, or did you
specify torture_type=rcu_bh or torture_type=srcu to the modprobe command?

This was on i386, x86_64, or on something else?

Ah!  This would have been a CONFIG_PREEMPT build, right?

						Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-29 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-27 20:01 2.6.17-rt1 : x86_64 oops Dipankar Sarma
2006-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH] 2.6.17-rt1 : fix " Dipankar Sarma
2006-06-28 19:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-28 20:02     ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-06-29 14:24       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-29 16:32         ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2006-06-29 19:41           ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-06-29 20:11             ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-29 21:35               ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-07-03 16:57               ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-07-04  4:15                 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-07-04  6:43                   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-04  6:50                     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-05  9:11                       ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-07-26  7:36                         ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-07-06 20:06                       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060629163236.GD1294@us.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox