From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, jlan@engr.sgi.com,
balbir@in.ibm.com, csturtiv@sgi.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch][RFC] Disabling per-tgid stats on task exit in taskstats
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:38:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060629173805.f189de1a.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44A46C6C.1090405@watson.ibm.com>
Shailabh wrote:
> Uh, oh....looks like I've triggered another monologue from PJ :-)
Oh dear, my reputation precedes me.
> The overhead of creating cpusets just for this
> reason seems excessive when the need is only to
> reduce the number of sockets to monitor
What sort of overhead do you have in mind here?
I'm suspecting you mean the mental overhead to the programmer coding
for this, who might complain at having to learn a whole new subsystem
(cpusets) just to say how to group CPUs for collecting these stats.
> Throttling or flow control etc. would be a systemwide policy.
My natural inclination is to disagree with this. Increasingly
popular large systems running heterogenous loads benefit from
finer granularity policies.
Though I will be honest in acknowledging that I have not studied
these taskstats in detail, so my inclinations may be off the mark.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-30 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 134+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-09 7:41 [Patch][RFC] Disabling per-tgid stats on task exit in taskstats Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-09 8:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-09 10:51 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-09 11:21 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-09 13:20 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-09 18:25 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-09 19:12 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-09 15:36 ` Balbir Singh
2006-06-09 18:35 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-09 19:31 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-09 21:56 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-09 22:42 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-09 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-09 23:47 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-09 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-10 12:21 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-12 18:31 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-12 21:57 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-10 13:05 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-12 18:54 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-21 19:11 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-21 19:14 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-21 19:34 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-21 23:35 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-21 23:45 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-23 17:14 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-23 18:19 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-23 18:53 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-23 20:00 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-23 20:16 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-23 20:36 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-23 21:19 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-23 22:07 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-23 23:47 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-24 2:59 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-24 4:39 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-24 5:59 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-26 17:33 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-26 17:52 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-26 17:55 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-26 18:00 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-26 18:12 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-26 18:26 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-26 18:39 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-26 18:49 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-26 19:00 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-28 21:30 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-28 21:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-28 22:02 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-29 8:40 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 12:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-06-29 16:44 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 18:01 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-29 18:07 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 18:26 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 19:15 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 19:41 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 21:42 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 21:54 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-29 22:09 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 22:23 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-30 0:15 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 0:40 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-30 1:00 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 1:05 ` Paul Jackson
[not found] ` <44A46C6C.1090405@watson.ibm.com>
2006-06-30 0:38 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2006-06-30 2:21 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-30 2:46 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 2:54 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-30 3:02 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 19:22 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 19:10 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 19:23 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 19:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-29 19:43 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 20:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-29 22:13 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 23:00 ` jamal
2006-06-29 20:01 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-29 21:22 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 22:54 ` jamal
2006-06-30 0:38 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 1:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-30 1:11 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 1:30 ` jamal
2006-06-30 3:01 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 12:45 ` jamal
2006-06-30 2:25 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-30 2:35 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-30 2:43 ` Paul Jackson
2006-06-29 19:33 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-30 18:53 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 19:10 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 19:19 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 20:19 ` jamal
2006-06-30 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-01 2:20 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-01 2:43 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-01 3:37 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-01 3:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 21:11 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-03 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-04 0:13 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-04 0:38 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-04 20:19 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-04 20:22 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-04 0:54 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-04 1:01 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-04 13:05 ` jamal
2006-07-04 15:18 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-04 16:37 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-04 19:24 ` jamal
2006-07-05 14:09 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-05 20:25 ` Chris Sturtivant
2006-07-05 20:32 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-03 4:53 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-03 15:02 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-03 15:55 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-03 16:31 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-04 0:09 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-07-04 19:59 ` Paul Jackson
2006-07-05 17:20 ` Jay Lan
2006-07-05 18:18 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-30 22:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-29 18:05 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-29 12:42 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-24 3:08 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-21 20:38 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21 21:31 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-21 21:45 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-21 21:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21 22:19 ` Jay Lan
2006-06-21 21:59 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-09 15:55 ` Chris Sturtivant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060629173805.f189de1a.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=csturtiv@sgi.com \
--cc=jlan@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox