public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] kernel/sys.c: remove unused exports
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:58:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060629195828.GF19712@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060629124400.ee22dfbf.akpm@osdl.org>

On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:44:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:36:08 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:19:40 +0200
> > Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > This patch removes the following unused exports:
> > > - EXPORT_SYMBOL:
> > >   - in_egroup_p
> > > - EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL's:
> > >   - kernel_restart
> > >   - kernel_halt
> > 
> > Switch 'em to EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOL and I'll stop dropping your patches ;)
> > 
> 
> If doing this, I'd suggest it be done thusly:
> 
> EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOL(in_egroup_p);	/* June 2006 */
> 
> to aid later decision-making.

I had some bad experiences with following processes you suggest the 
doesn't remove the symbol immediately:

As you wanted me to do, I scheduled the EXPORT_SYMBOL(insert_resource) 
for removal on 2 May 2005 with both __deprecated_for_modules and an 
entry in feature-removal-schedule.txt with the target date April 2006.

On 11 Apr 2006, I sent the patch to implement this scheduled removal.

As of today, the latter patch is still stuck in -mm (which isn't better 
than having it dropped) although it's long overdue.

Do you understand why I distrust your "to aid later decision-making"?

Can you state publically "If there's still no in-kernel user after six 
months, the removal is automatically ACK'ed."?

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-29 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-29 19:19 [RFC: 2.6 patch] kernel/sys.c: remove unused exports Adrian Bunk
2006-06-29 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-29 19:44   ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-29 19:58     ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-06-29 20:06       ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-29 21:18         ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-02 16:52           ` Eric W. Biederman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-23 10:55 Adrian Bunk
2006-05-16 17:44 Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060629195828.GF19712@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox