From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932067AbWF3Bld (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:41:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932387AbWF3Bld (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:41:33 -0400 Received: from [141.84.69.5] ([141.84.69.5]:19475 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932067AbWF3Blc (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:41:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:40:50 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Andrew Morton Cc: Lee Revell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds , Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n Message-ID: <20060630014050.GI19712@stusta.de> References: <20060629192121.GC19712@stusta.de> <1151628246.22380.58.camel@mindpipe> <20060629180706.64a58f95.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060629180706.64a58f95.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:07:06PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Lee Revell wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 21:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > This patch was already sent on: > > > - 26 Jun 2006 > > > - 27 Apr 2006 > > > - 19 Apr 2006 > > > - 11 Apr 2006 > > > - 10 Mar 2006 > > > - 29 Jan 2006 > > > - 21 Jan 2006 > > > > 3 days ago? That seems a bit silly. Why didn't you just ping Andrew on > > it? > > > > Andrew, what's the status of this? Can we get an ACK or a NACK before > > this starts getting reposted every day? ;-) > > I am stolidly letting the arch maintainers and the developer of this > feature work out what to do. Andrea is proud of getting a patent for the server part [1], so I doubt he would be happy with no longer having the client part defaulting to Y... It might sound a bit strange that although Alan Cox and Linus Torvalds even wrote an open letter to the President of the European Parliament calling "Software patents are also the utmost threat to the development of Linux and other free software products" [2]... One bonus point for people arguing in favor of software patents - even Linux actively supports patented services. cu Adrian [1] http://www.cpushare.com/legal [2] http://www.effi.org/patentit/patents_torvalds_cox.txt -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed