From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751469AbWF3IOc (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:14:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751473AbWF3IOc (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:14:32 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191]:13274 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751469AbWF3IOb (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:14:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GfpfcEm08pO1Oa2+foMc3Ys5HMxU/gqD4gSI1dMbFKvNDq3KDNmsFfzzMbunpqWimWc8yTUAQIYKx6SrlUEQBfSTroNYsH+Pwlz0cRXVbbX2/WeQp76BresCStUBpVGd85y9WcHr4PLPQyh3SmQPNqbwC8FOd6i/hCa8zmIBaoc= Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:14:28 +0200 From: Paolo Ornati To: Adam Kropelin Cc: Paolo Ornati , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH-v2] Documentation: remove duplicated words Message-ID: <20060630101428.25f92377@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060629132203.A6460@mail.kroptech.com> References: <20060629164128.5ba9d264@localhost> <20060629132203.A6460@mail.kroptech.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:22:03 -0400 Adam Kropelin wrote: > > Remove every (hopefully) duplicated word under Documentation/ and do > > other small cleanups. > > > > Examples: > > "and and" --> "and" > > "in in" --> "in" > > ... > > When the duplicatation was due to a typo, removing the duplicate is the > not the correct fix. Additionally, there are cases where the text > actually reads better (or no worse) with the duplication in place. Ok, thanks a lot. I've redone the whole thing and I'll send an updated patch with ONLY changes I'm sure about (=trivial). I've intentionally left out things I'm not sure about to fix as much as possible without breaking anything (and to avoid others to re-read the long patch every time). -- Paolo Ornati Linux 2.6.17.1 on x86_64