From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932537AbWF3RRa (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:17:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932580AbWF3RRa (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:17:30 -0400 Received: from mailhost.alabanza.com ([209.239.39.56]:8079 "EHLO mailhost.alabanza.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932537AbWF3RR3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:17:29 -0400 From: eclark To: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: problem with new kernel Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:13:13 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200606301046.17526.eclark@alabanza.com> <1151685938.11434.51.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1151685938.11434.51.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606301313.13691.eclark@alabanza.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org My apologies for the double email. For what its worth: [root@dev linux-2.4.32]# getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION NPTL 0.60 Not sure what that implies (other than its still broke. :| ) On Friday 30 June 2006 12:45 pm, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Hi, > > you're running a kernel without NPTL support on a distribution that > apparently expects NPTL support to be in the kernel... the failure mode > isn't nice but failure at all isn't totally unexpected...... NPTL is > needed for certain functionality and if a distribution expects that to > be there.. things may well go very wonky if absent. (yes glibc tries to > emulate this but the emulation is quite limited and not really possible)