From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@hansmi.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, khali@linux-fr.org,
linux-kernel@killerfox.forkbomb.ch, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
stelian@popies.net, chainsaw@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Apple Motion Sensor driver
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 21:00:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060702210034.8abeb4d5.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1151898448.19419.32.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:47:28 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 20:14 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 00:26:49 +0200
> > Michael Hanselmann <linux-kernel@hansmi.ch> wrote:
> >
> > > Below you find the latest revision of my AMS driver.
> >
> > I was about to merge the below, then this comes along. Now what?
>
> Michael's driver is a new version that adds support for non-i2c (PMU
> based) chips found on new machines. It would be nice to have it, though
> it definitely needs a bit of review from Stelian, the original author.
>
> What I would suggest at this point is to merge Stelian's original
> driver, as you were about todo, then have Michael produce a patch
> against it to be reviewed that could then be merged later on. I'm fine
> having that "later on" still be in the 2.6.18 timeframe since we aren't
> talking about anything critical here, just a fairly minor driver update
> that is nice to have, but we can decide that later based on the reviews
> of Michael's changes).
Yes, but it wouldn't be a "patch against it" - Michael's patch adds
multiple files with different names. So it would be a revert-and-redo.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-03 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-02 22:26 [RFC] Apple Motion Sensor driver Michael Hanselmann
2006-07-03 2:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-07-03 3:14 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 3:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-07-03 4:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-07-03 6:56 ` Michael Hanselmann
2006-07-03 9:02 ` Stelian Pop
2006-07-03 7:29 ` Jean Delvare
2006-07-03 8:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-07-03 10:12 ` Stelian Pop
2006-07-03 10:19 ` Johannes Berg
2006-07-03 10:45 ` Michael Hanselmann
2006-07-03 10:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-07-03 11:31 ` Stelian Pop
2006-07-03 13:16 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-07-03 13:25 ` Stefan Richter
2006-07-03 13:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-07-03 22:45 ` Michael Hanselmann
2006-07-04 16:45 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060702210034.8abeb4d5.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=chainsaw@gentoo.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@hansmi.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@killerfox.forkbomb.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=stelian@popies.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox