From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@insightbb.com>
To: Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Michael Hanselmann <linux-kernel@hansmi.ch>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
khali@linux-fr.org, linux-kernel@killerfox.forkbomb.ch,
johannes@sipsolutions.net, chainsaw@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Apple Motion Sensor driver
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 09:16:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607030916.37896.dtor@insightbb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1151926278.10711.25.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Monday 03 July 2006 07:31, Stelian Pop wrote:
> Le lundi 03 juillet 2006 à 20:49 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 12:45 +0200, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:12:47PM +0200, Stelian Pop wrote:
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static DEVICE_ATTR(mouse, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> > > > > + ams_mouse_show_mouse, ams_mouse_store_mouse);
> > >
> > > > I would prefer three different files for x, y and z instead of a single
> > > > one...
> > >
> > > Because of the way the values are calculated with orientation, that
> > > would mean that if a program needs all three, either all values are read
> > > three times or the ams_sensors function gets much more complicated.
> > >
> > > To prevent it from having to read them three times in a row, I joined
> > > all three values.
> > >
> > > Do you think I should rewrite the ams_sensors function to only get the
> > > correct value?
> >
> > Cache the values and only re-read from the hardware after a given amount
> > of time has elapsed ?
>
> Seems to be a good idea indeed.
>
But what is the purpose of that attribute anyway? I'd just drop it completely.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-03 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-02 22:26 [RFC] Apple Motion Sensor driver Michael Hanselmann
2006-07-03 2:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-07-03 3:14 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 3:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-07-03 4:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 6:56 ` Michael Hanselmann
2006-07-03 9:02 ` Stelian Pop
2006-07-03 7:29 ` Jean Delvare
2006-07-03 8:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-07-03 10:12 ` Stelian Pop
2006-07-03 10:19 ` Johannes Berg
2006-07-03 10:45 ` Michael Hanselmann
2006-07-03 10:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-07-03 11:31 ` Stelian Pop
2006-07-03 13:16 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2006-07-03 13:25 ` Stefan Richter
2006-07-03 13:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-07-03 22:45 ` Michael Hanselmann
2006-07-04 16:45 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200607030916.37896.dtor@insightbb.com \
--to=dtor@insightbb.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=chainsaw@gentoo.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@hansmi.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@killerfox.forkbomb.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=stelian@popies.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox