From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751149AbWGDHlD (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 03:41:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751186AbWGDHlD (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 03:41:03 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:39588 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751149AbWGDHlB (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 03:41:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:36:21 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Miles Lane Cc: Alan Cox , Arjan van de Ven , Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 + pcmcia/hostap/8139too patches -- inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage Message-ID: <20060704073621.GA7034@elte.hu> References: <1151963034.3108.59.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1151965557.16528.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: -3.1 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-3.1 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Miles Lane wrote: > Arjan, the patch you sent does cause the lockdep message to disappear, > but the card doesn't work. [...] did the card work without the patch? The lockdep messages themselves are harmless to functionality, they shouldnt ever break anything, they are just information for us to fix potential deadlocks. Ingo