From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030194AbWGFF7X (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:59:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030210AbWGFF7X (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:59:23 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:41652 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030194AbWGFF7W (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 01:59:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 22:59:05 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Cc: kmannth@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, Natalie.Protasevich@UNISYS.com Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm6 Message-Id: <20060705225905.53e61ca0.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20060703030355.420c7155.akpm@osdl.org> <20060705155037.7228aa48.akpm@osdl.org> <20060705164457.60e6dbc2.akpm@osdl.org> <20060705164820.379a69ba.akpm@osdl.org> <20060705172545.815872b6.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 23:42:00 -0600 ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > So I suspect that we need to de-percpuify kernel_stat.irqs. I think so. We do: struct irq_desc *desc = irq_desc + irq; kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq]++; followed immediately by spin_lock(&desc->lock); false optimisation, or what?