From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965095AbWGFAhP (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:37:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965096AbWGFAhP (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:37:15 -0400 Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.125]:51917 "HELO pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965095AbWGFAhO (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:37:14 -0400 From: Nigel Cunningham To: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [klibc 30/31] Remove in-kernel resume-from-disk invocation code Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:37:07 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, klibc@zytor.com References: <200607060940.40678.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <44AC551B.8090204@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <44AC551B.8090204@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1769566.2INcNg3KTL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607061037.11177.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart1769566.2INcNg3KTL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi. On Thursday 06 July 2006 10:11, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > This patch doesn't look right to me. After it is applied, the user will > > have no way of saying that they don't want to resume (noresume). I assu= me > > the removal of resume=3D isn't a problem because you're expecting them = to > > use that other undocumented way of setting resume=3D that Pavel mention= ed a > > while ago? > > Yes, they have. The handing of resume=3D and noresume are now done in > kinit; resume is invoked from userspace by direct command only. Ah. So it's still valid to have resume=3D and noresume on the commandline, = and=20 klibc greps /proc/cmdline? So, for Suspend2, would I be ok just leaving people to add the echo=20 > /proc/suspend2/do_resume, as we currently do for initrds and initramfses? > There is nothing undocumented about it. Ok. I guess my memory is stale :). Regards, Nigel =2D-=20 Nigel, Michelle and Alisdair Cunningham 5 Mitchell Street Cobden 3266 Victoria, Australia --nextPart1769566.2INcNg3KTL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBErFs3N0y+n1M3mo0RAlDuAJ9lHkzq5zTwBQkcDVmrM/OZlVOeYwCgo9lT PJXtbhaTjWSLvTRQFZ9Y9Ko= =+UzK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1769566.2INcNg3KTL--