public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] 2.6.17.1 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 13:16:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060706201616.GA10760@frankl.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607061333_MC3-1-C44C-96D1@compuserve.com>

Chuck,

On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:30:14PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <20060704152857.GA6999@frankl.hpl.hp.com>
> 
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 08:28:57 -0700, Stephan Eranian wrote:
> 
> > Here is what I get on my dual 2.4GHz Opteron 250:
> > 
> > booted with idle=halt
> > $ pfmon --us-c -ecpu_clk_unhalted,interrupts_masked_cycles_with_interrupt_pending,interrupts_masked_cycles,cycles_no_fpu_ops_retired -k --system-wide -t 10
> > <session to end in 10 seconds>
> > CPU0                    11,356,210 CPU_CLK_UNHALTED                               
> > CPU0                             0 INTERRUPTS_MASKED_CYCLES_WITH_INTERRUPT_PENDING
> > CPU0                     3,836,107 INTERRUPTS_MASKED_CYCLES                       
> > CPU0                23,910,784,532 CYCLES_NO_FPU_OPS_RETIRED                      
> > CPU1                    19,303,632 CPU_CLK_UNHALTED                               
> > CPU1                             0 INTERRUPTS_MASKED_CYCLES_WITH_INTERRUPT_PENDING
> > CPU1                    13,942,265 INTERRUPTS_MASKED_CYCLES                       
> > CPU1                23,911,872,654 CYCLES_NO_FPU_OPS_RETIRED                      
> 
> So it looks like your Opteron continues to count CYCLES_NO_FPU_OPS_RETIRED
> at full clock speed even when halted.
> 

Yes, it certainly looks like it, idling at full clock speed. But that's a server CPU!
I think this may have to do with latency to get back to useful work.


> My Turion appears to slow down to ~40 MHz when halted and counts those
> events at that speed.  Using idle=poll shows no slowdown, as expected,
> and unhalted clocks equals cycles_no_fpu_ops_retired.
> 
That's a mobile processor, so I would expect it to use more aggressive
power-saving scheme while idle, at the cost of higher latency to get
back to full speed. 

The good thing about this is that it was not too hard to figure out what is
going using pfmon. Where you specifically looking for this? Is this a documented
behavior of the Turion64?

-- 
-Stephane

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-06 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-06 17:30 [PATCH 10/17] 2.6.17.1 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch Chuck Ebbert
2006-07-06 20:16 ` Stephane Eranian [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-01 15:21 Chuck Ebbert
2006-07-04 15:28 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-06-30 19:17 Chuck Ebbert
2006-06-30 19:37 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-30 18:33 Chuck Ebbert
2006-06-30 18:42 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-30 18:43 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-06-30 20:40 ` Stephane Eranian
2006-06-23  9:13 Stephane Eranian
2006-06-30 12:27 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-30 12:36   ` Stephane Eranian
2006-06-30 12:59     ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-30 13:29       ` Stephane Eranian
2006-06-30 13:41         ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-30 14:12           ` Stephane Eranian
2006-06-30 14:33             ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-30 16:02               ` Stephane Eranian
2006-06-30 17:08                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-30 20:47                   ` Stephane Eranian
2006-07-03  9:49       ` Stephane Eranian
2006-07-03 19:25         ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-03 19:22           ` Stephane Eranian
2006-07-03 19:36             ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060706201616.GA10760@frankl.hpl.hp.com \
    --to=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox