From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: harmon@ksu.edu, vsu@altlinux.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: acpi gets wrong interrupt for via sata in 2.6.16.17
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:55:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060706205509.4e4ae2ee.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060707034735.GA12908@tuatara.stupidest.org>
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:47:35 -0700
Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:14:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > I have both reversion patches queued up but haven't heard from
> > anyone about anything.
>
> i saw that --- i don't think it's right, but it's not more wrong than
> having that merged as-is in the first place which i'll argue is wrong
> by virtue of the fact we run the quirk everywhere and apparently break
> things
>
> > I don't know if anyone's working on this bug.
>
> it's not forgotten, i'm waiting to hear back from people still.
> enabling ACPI *should* suffice, but for some people clearly it doesn't
> (there are claims VIA got their ACPI wrong so this might explain why
> it works for some people and not others)
>
> > Thursday is my subsystem-maintainer-spamming day, so the reverts
> > will be heading Gregwards today.
>
> like i said, i really don't think reverting the patches is technically
> correct, but given that i don't have adequate hardware to test against
> it might be the least painful option right now
Yes, it's a question of whose machines we choose to break.
It'd be great to get this thing nailed. Do the people who are out testing
things need re-asking?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-07 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-25 1:28 acpi gets wrong interrupt for via sata in 2.6.16.17 Scott J. Harmon
2006-06-25 9:24 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-06-26 3:58 ` Scott J. Harmon
2006-06-28 0:04 ` Scott J. Harmon
2006-07-07 0:30 ` Scott J. Harmon
2006-07-07 1:14 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-07 3:47 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-07 3:55 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-09-01 3:07 ` Scott J. Harmon
2006-09-01 3:11 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060706205509.4e4ae2ee.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=harmon@ksu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vsu@altlinux.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox