From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1750987AbWGFWuE@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1750987AbWGFWuE (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:50:04 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750991AbWGFWuE
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:50:04 -0400
Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:14780 "EHLO mx1.suse.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750987AbWGFWuC (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:50:02 -0400
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:46:14 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: "Scott J. Harmon" <harmon@ksu.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.17.4
Message-ID: <20060706224614.GA3520@suse.de>
References: <20060706222704.GB2946@kroah.com> <20060706222841.GD2946@kroah.com> <44AD9229.6010301@ksu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <44AD9229.6010301@ksu.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 05:43:53PM -0500, Scott J. Harmon wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index 8c72521..abcf2d7 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> >  VERSION = 2
> >  PATCHLEVEL = 6
> >  SUBLEVEL = 17
> > -EXTRAVERSION = .3
> > +EXTRAVERSION = .4
> >  NAME=Crazed Snow-Weasel
> >  
> >  # *DOCUMENTATION*
> > diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> > index 0b6ec0e..59273f7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sys.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> > @@ -1991,7 +1991,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_prctl(int option, un
> >  			error = current->mm->dumpable;
> >  			break;
> >  		case PR_SET_DUMPABLE:
> > -			if (arg2 < 0 || arg2 > 2) {
> > +			if (arg2 < 0 || arg2 > 1) {
> >  				error = -EINVAL;
> >  				break;
> >  			}
> Just curious as to why this isn't just
> ...
> 			if (arg2 != 1) {
> ...

Because that would be incorrect :)

thanks,

greg k-h