From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932185AbWGGQ67 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:58:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932192AbWGGQ67 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:58:59 -0400 Received: from [198.99.130.12] ([198.99.130.12]:24014 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932185AbWGGQ66 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:58:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:58:51 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: "Brock, Anthony - NET" Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 19/19] UML - Make mconsole version requestshappen in a process Message-ID: <20060707165851.GA5391@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200607070033.k670Xt1w008752@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <7B4268E5ACB878429B58D4BE5B780E83010B6B42@NWS-EXCH2.nws.oregonstate.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7B4268E5ACB878429B58D4BE5B780E83010B6B42@NWS-EXCH2.nws.oregonstate.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:31:50AM -0700, Brock, Anthony - NET wrote: > I'm running UML on an SMP machine, but have never encountered the "hang" > issue. Is this text still accurate? No, it's ancient history. No one ever figured out what the problem was, but it hasn't been seen in ages. > Also, can this command still be used > to "wake up" a UML process? Is this still the recommended means for > verifying that a UML process if running? No, and no. Jeff