From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932439AbWGHAXY (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:23:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932436AbWGHAXX (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:23:23 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:52632 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932439AbWGHAXX (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:23:23 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC 7/8] Single zone optimizations Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 02:19:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Bligh , Christoph Hellwig , Marcelo Tosatti , Arjan van de Ven , Nick Piggin , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki References: <20060708000501.3829.25578.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20060708000537.3829.77811.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20060708000537.3829.77811.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607080219.11049.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 08 July 2006 02:05, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Single Zone Optimizations > > If we only have a single zone then various macros can be optimized. > > We do not need to protect higher zones etc etc. Nearly all the stuff you remove is slow path and even __init where neither performance nor code size matter much. The ifdefs look ugly. I have my doubts they are worth it. -Andi >