From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964783AbWGHLVL (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 07:21:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964798AbWGHLVK (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 07:21:10 -0400 Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.125]:20696 "HELO pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S964783AbWGHLVJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 07:21:09 -0400 From: Nigel Cunningham To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability] Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 21:21:01 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Avuton Olrich , Bojan Smojver , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, Olivier Galibert , grundig , jan@rychter.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060707232523.GC1746@elf.ucw.cz> <3aa654a40607072133i55ffe0d1ke9f0905c6599864c@mail.gmail.com> <20060708111226.GI1700@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060708111226.GI1700@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4274770.53iV5TL0Z4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607082121.06045.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart4274770.53iV5TL0Z4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi. On Saturday 08 July 2006 21:12, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > >Now... switching to uswsusp kernel parts will make it slightly harder > > >to install in the short term (messing with initrd). OTOH there's at > > >least _chance_ to get to the point where suspend "just works" in > > >Linux, in the long term... > > > > Long term being the key words. When will uswsusp be concidered 'rock > > solid'? 2008+? Suspend2 is rock solid _today_. Imagine a world where > > uswsusp is probably going to be used for SUSE10.2, so it will have to > be solid at that point. And SUSE10.2 is going to be > end-of-2006/early-2007, IIRC. > > > Linux drivers were as reliable as swsusp (granted I tried to get > > uswsusp working and I gave up before messing with the initrd stuff). > > Can I get proper bug report? > > > In order for uswsusp to make Suspend2 obsolete, it would have to *at > > least* support what Suspend2 does. Unfortunately, that isn't the case > > right now. > > Suspend2 does not have all the features uswsusp has, and uswsusp does > not have all the features suspend2 has. Oh. You mean the rsa key thing? Regards, Nigel =2D-=20 Nigel, Michelle and Alisdair Cunningham 5 Mitchell Street Cobden 3266 Victoria, Australia --nextPart4274770.53iV5TL0Z4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEr5UiN0y+n1M3mo0RApuZAJ9yLfg4lEp1unu+YO+zz4JXhTxjFwCgg09v 8kkRLY6jw25kL5MU0cjTsxY= =ezvc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4274770.53iV5TL0Z4--