From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932358AbWGIACt (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:02:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932370AbWGIACt (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:02:49 -0400 Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.125]:17293 "HELO pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932358AbWGIACt (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:02:49 -0400 From: Nigel Cunningham To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability] Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 10:02:41 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, Olivier Galibert , grundig , Avuton Olrich , jan@rychter.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060627133321.GB3019@elf.ucw.cz> <200607090828.36834.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <20060708235434.GG2546@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060708235434.GG2546@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1499802.7uYzLG8ZNS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607091002.48153.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart1499802.7uYzLG8ZNS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi. On Sunday 09 July 2006 09:54, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > > It's only too slow on swsusp. With Suspend2, I regularly suspend > > > > > 1GB images on both my desktop and laptop machines. I agree that it > > > > > might be slower on a > > > > > > uswsusp is as fast as suspend2. It does same LZF compression. > > > > I agree for uncompressed images - I tried timing the writing of the ima= ge > > yesterday. I'm not sure about LZF though, because I couldn't get it to > > resume. I'd be interested to see it really be as fast as suspend2 with > > compression. > > Is there any way to help you? I assume normal swsusp resumes okay so > it is not driver problem? That's right. I'll see if I can figure it out tomorrow, Lord willing. I=20 have /dev/snapshot in my initrd but it gives that prompt asking for the=20 device name. By the way, will it sit there foreever, or does that have a=20 timeout? > > > Do you think you could get some repeatable benchmark for Rafael? He > > > worked quite hard on feature only to find out it makes little > > > difference... > > > > Sure, but it will mean more if all of the tests are run on the same > > system, so I'll have another go at getting uswsusp to resume, when I get > > the chance. > > Thanks. No problem. Nigel =2D-=20 Nigel, Michelle and Alisdair Cunningham 5 Mitchell Street Cobden 3266 Victoria, Australia --nextPart1499802.7uYzLG8ZNS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEsEeoN0y+n1M3mo0RAq98AJ4zlL6pHardtLSnFoZclOKy7IasygCgh0jA ihtpeTJGKQDgxdWRZ+G9SaA= =kqVv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1499802.7uYzLG8ZNS--