public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Singer <elf@buici.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: DMA memory, split_page, BUG_ON(PageCompound()), sound
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 19:51:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060710025103.GC28166@cerise.buici.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44B0774E.5010103@yahoo.com.au>

On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 01:26:06PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Marc Singer wrote:
> >I'm investigating why I am triggering a BUG_ON in split_page() when I
> >use the sound subsystems dma memory allocation aide.
> >
> >The crux of the problem appears to be that snd_malloc_dev_pages()
> >passes __GFP_COMP into dma_alloc_coherent().  On the ARM and several
> >other architectures, the dma allocation code calls split_page () with
> >pages allocated with this flag which, in turn, triggers the BUG_ON()
> >check for the CompoundPage flag.
> >
> >So, the questions are these: Who is doing the wrong thing?  Should the
> >snd_malloc_dev_pages() call drop the __GFP_COMP flag?  Should
> >split_page() allow the page to be compound?  Should __GFP_COMP be 0 on
> >ARM and other architectures that don't support compound pages?
> 
> I personally never liked the explicit __GFP_COMP going in everywhere,
> and would have much preferred a GFP_USERMAP, which the architecture /
> allocator could satisfy as they liked.

Thus, the __GFP_COMP bit would be part of another flags such that it
is set on x86 (or any other architecture that supports it) and clear
on those that don't.

> As a hack, you can make arm's dma_alloc_coherent() drop __GFP_COMP,
> which should work.

There are many architectures that have this problem, so I suspect that
such a patch would be unappreciated.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-10  2:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-09  0:07 DMA memory, split_page, BUG_ON(PageCompound()), sound Marc Singer
2006-07-09  3:26 ` Nick Piggin
2006-07-10  2:51   ` Marc Singer [this message]
2006-07-10  6:59     ` Nick Piggin
2006-07-10 16:26       ` Russell King
2006-07-10 17:34         ` Nick Piggin
2006-07-10 22:27           ` Marc Singer
2006-07-11  2:51           ` Marc Singer
2006-07-12 10:32           ` Russell King
2006-07-13 13:30             ` Takashi Iwai
2006-07-13 13:38               ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060710025103.GC28166@cerise.buici.com \
    --to=elf@buici.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox