From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161171AbWGIVqZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2006 17:46:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161173AbWGIVqZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2006 17:46:25 -0400 Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.125]:22474 "HELO pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1161171AbWGIVqZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2006 17:46:25 -0400 From: Nigel Cunningham To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:46:20 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Bojan Smojver , Pavel Machek , Arjan van de Ven , Sunil Kumar , Avuton Olrich , Olivier Galibert , Jan Rychter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, grundig References: <20060627133321.GB3019@elf.ucw.cz> <200607100706.45789.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <200607092336.44208.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200607092336.44208.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1556384.FS70y7KZMn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200607100746.25043.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart1556384.FS70y7KZMn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi. On Monday 10 July 2006 07:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday 09 July 2006 23:06, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > ]-- snip --[ > > > > Now there's the separate problem that we have to share _some_ code. > > > To an absolute minimum, we have to share the freezer code and the > > > code that handles devices, because it's also shared by suspend-to-RAM. > > > The code that handles devices is already shared, but we also _have_ > > > _to_ share the freezer code. Therefore, as long as suspend2 adds some > > > code to the freezer, it's not even close to be considerable for > > > merging. > > > > If Suspend2 added code in a way that broke swsusp, I would agree. But it > > doesn't. > > This is not a matter of any breakage or lack thereof. The problem is that > the freezer is _not_ _an_ _swsusp-only_ _code_. It is used by someone el= se > too, and having two different freezers in the tree would be _insane_, > because too many things depend on that. This would be like having two > different memory management systems, but at a smaller scale. Please don't start doing what Pavel does, imputing to me motives and ideas= =20 that are clearly false. You know that I don't want to have two freezer=20 implementations - I've never suggested the idea or even thought of it until= =20 you suggested it. My desire all along has been to improve what's already=20 there, and I still want to do that. I'm sorry that I'm not submitting and resubmitting things as fast as you'd= =20 like. Please try to remember that I'm not a full time programmer. I'm worki= ng=20 for Redhat one day a week and the congregation I serve four days a week.=20 Anything I do beyond the one day is purely my time, and I have plenty of=20 other things to do too. It's not, therefore, that I want to drag my heels.= =20 Rather, I simply don't have the time to get things done as quickly as you a= nd=20 Pavel seem to be able to. Regards, Nigel =2D-=20 Nigel, Michelle and Alisdair Cunningham 5 Mitchell Street Cobden 3266 Victoria, Australia --nextPart1556384.FS70y7KZMn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEsXkxN0y+n1M3mo0RAqWdAJ9vUTjaViihnlwoYurJyWLSh6Nv8ACfdgZw FKVSRrIz/r/PALuqYTJoZgA= =e/Ko -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1556384.FS70y7KZMn--