From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932486AbWGJJWM (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:22:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932482AbWGJJWM (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:22:12 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:28908 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932486AbWGJJWL (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:22:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:16:25 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: David Brownell , Linux Kernel list , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, Andrew Victor , Alessandro Zummo , rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.18-rc1] genirq: {en,dis}able_irq_wake() need refcounting too Message-ID: <20060710091625.GA7840@elte.hu> References: <200607091458.52298.david-b@pacbell.net> <20060710085849.GA6016@elte.hu> <20060710091340.GA4400@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20060710091920.GB4400@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060710091920.GB4400@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: -3.1 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-3.1 required=5.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5001] 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Russell King wrote: > Let's first get genirq to a point where it's a direct replacement for > my IRQ subsystem before thinking about changing existing APIs (and > thereby possibly introducing other breakage.) note that the API change i suggested was a NOP operation :-) The APIs were already shaped that way. No need to worry. Ingo