Re: [patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n

Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-11T16:24:07Z

On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 18:13 +0200, andrea@cpushare.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 05:54:02PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > Ehm I wasn't aware all linux vendors in the world owe that to you, or
> > that you own their kernel configuration
>
> I perfectly know nobody owes anything to me, I said I didn't expect it
> because it sounds very weird having to take an anti-fedora position in a
> project like CPUShare.

it sounds very weird taking an anti-fedora position without even having
asked Fedora to turn it on. But maybe that's just me.