From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: andrea@cpushare.com
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:02:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060711160236.GX13938@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060711153117.GJ7192@opteron.random>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 05:31:17PM +0200, andrea@cpushare.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 04:32:53PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>...
> > if there is overhead, and there is no general use for it (which there
> > isn't really) then it should be off imo.
>
> I hope the reason was the lack of my last patch. But even in such case
> RH could have turned off the tsc thing immediately themself (they know
> how to patch the kernel no?) or they could have asked me a single
> question about it before turning it off, no?
>
> I hope RH will reconsider with my last patch applied and at the light of
> this email as well:
>
> http://www.cpushare.com/hypermail/cpushare-discuss/06/01/0080.html
>
> If they don't reconsider I'll be forced to recommend the Fedora CPUShare
> users to switch distro if they don't want having to recompile the kernel
> by themself.
>
> I guess now I understand why this new change of mind of Ingo: if he
> would succeed to push the N in the main kernel, then nobody could
> complain to fedora for setting it to N, while they're in a less obvious
> position at the moment where the kernel says "default to y" and they set
> it to N to be happy.
>...
WTF are you smoking?
You said yourself that your feature has currently exactly 121 users.
And why should anyone have to contact you before disabling your feature?
Everyone enables the subset of features he considers useful, and there's
no reason to contact anyone when disabling a feature in the kernel
(or would you consider it a morally bad thing that I disabled kernel
preemption in my kernel without asking anyone for permission?).
And it was you who said just a few days ago [1]:
<-- snip -->
...
If I've to keep reading these threads about CONFIG_SECCOMP every few
months then set it to N (even if I disagree with that setting). Like
Alan said, what really matters is what distro will choose in their
config, not the default (and I doubt fedora ships with cifs=Y like the
default where only the required stuff is set to Y, please focus on the
big stuff first ;).
<-- snip -->
cu
Adrian
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/30/132
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-11 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-29 19:21 [2.6 patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n Adrian Bunk
2006-06-30 0:44 ` Lee Revell
2006-06-30 1:07 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-30 1:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-06-30 4:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-06-30 9:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-30 14:58 ` andrea
2006-07-11 7:36 ` [patch] " Ingo Molnar
2006-07-11 14:17 ` andrea
2006-07-11 14:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-11 15:31 ` andrea
2006-07-11 15:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-11 16:13 ` andrea
2006-07-11 16:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-11 16:57 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-11 16:25 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-11 16:02 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-07-11 16:16 ` andrea
2006-07-11 16:24 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-12 15:43 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-12 21:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-12 22:06 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-12 22:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-12 22:33 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-12 22:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-13 3:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-07-13 11:23 ` Jeff Dike
2006-07-13 11:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-13 3:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-07-13 3:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-13 4:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-07-13 4:51 ` andrea
2006-07-13 5:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-13 6:22 ` andrea
2006-07-13 1:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-13 2:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-13 7:44 ` James Bruce
2006-07-13 8:34 ` andrea
2006-07-13 9:18 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-14 6:09 ` [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl andrea
2006-07-14 6:27 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-14 6:33 ` andrea
2006-07-13 12:13 ` [patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n Andi Kleen
2006-07-12 21:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-12 22:11 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-11 15:54 ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-30 12:39 ` [2.6 patch] " Alan Cox
2006-06-30 2:35 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-06-30 15:03 ` Lee Revell
2006-07-08 9:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2006-07-11 1:59 ` Andrew James Wade
2006-07-11 4:16 ` andrea
2006-07-11 20:19 ` Andrew James Wade
2006-07-12 21:05 ` andrea
2006-07-12 22:02 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-12 23:44 ` andrea
2006-07-13 21:29 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-13 23:11 ` andrea
2006-07-13 23:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-14 0:34 ` andrea
2006-07-15 2:55 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-07-16 0:51 ` andrea
2006-07-16 1:54 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-16 15:36 ` andrea
2006-07-13 2:56 ` Andrew James Wade
2006-07-12 21:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-13 1:16 ` andrea
2006-07-13 1:37 ` Andrew James Wade
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-12 21:37 [patch] " Chuck Ebbert
2006-07-12 21:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-12 22:48 ` andrea
2006-07-12 21:57 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-13 5:43 Albert Cahalan
2006-07-13 7:07 ` andrea
[not found] <6tgj0-8ip-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6xP8s-5mc-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6xUhQ-4Wx-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6xVdX-6oH-53@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6xVnz-6AI-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6xZUd-4Es-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6y7yy-7ws-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6y7RK-7TX-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-07-17 11:37 ` Bodo Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060711160236.GX13938@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=andrea@cpushare.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox