Re: [patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n

andrea
2006-07-11T16:16:13Z

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 06:02:36PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> And it was you who said just a few days ago [1]:
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> ...
> If I've to keep reading these threads about CONFIG_SECCOMP every few
> months then set it to N (even if I disagree with that setting). Like
> Alan said, what really matters is what distro will choose in their
> config, not the default (and I doubt fedora ships with cifs=Y like the
> default where only the required stuff is set to Y, please focus on the
> big stuff first ;).
>
> <-- snip -->

The above was in the context of the mainline kernel in case you didn't
notice (when I wrote the above I expected fedora to set it to Y even if
the main kernel was set to N, imagine how way off I was when I wrote the
above ;).