Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?

Alan Cox
2006-07-11T18:37:36Z

Ar Maw, 2006-07-11 am 11:22 -0700, ysgrifennodd H. Peter Anvin:
> You know how much code there is in glibc to make your /bin/ls still work?

A static linked pre libc 2.2 (thats libc not glibc) ls works fine today,
as does a 0.98.5 era built rogue binary