Re: [klibc] klibc and what's the next step?

Jeff Bailey
2006-07-04T01:38:36Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 957 bytes --]

Le lundi 03 juillet 2006 à 20:46 +0200, maximilian attems a écrit :
> well but busybox is big nowadays and generally compiled against glibc.
> i'm quite eager to kick busybox out of default Debian initramfs-tools
> to have an klibc only default initramfs. those tools are needed atm,
> and there is not enough yet. afaik suse adds sed on klibc with a minimal
> patch and we'd liked to have stat, kill and readlink on klibc-utils.
>
> how about busybox on klibc?

I made a brief attempt to do busybox on klibc before klcc was working
right for me. I should try that again. In Ubuntu, we already do a
separate build pass of busybox to get just the features that we want, it
would be easy to play with this.

I'll let you know. It'll take me a couple days - between travelling and
the long weekend, I'm a bit behind.

Tks,
Jeff Bailey

--
* Canonical Ltd * Ubuntu Service and Support * +1 514 691 7221 *

Linux for Human Beings.

[-- Attachment #2: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]