public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up old names in tty code to current names
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:54:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060711215422.GB663@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e4733910607100707g4810a86boa93a5b6b0b1a8d0a@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:07:41AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> >> I'm not going to solve this problem but it is something that needs to
> >> be discussed. Are we really going to maintain parallel naming schemes,
> >> one in-kernel and one out of kernel? I'm not even sure if USB will
> >> work without udev anymore.
> >
> >It works fine, it would not suprise me if udev users were still the
> >minority case in fact.

Well, as more modern distros spread, the number of users is getting
bigger..

> If I use udev to rename my devices, the names aren't going to match
> /proc/tty and what ps shows.

Same problem happens if you use 'mv'.  Are you going to blame the kernel
on that problem too?

> The idea behind udev is that the kernel only deals in device numbers
> and all naming happens in user space.

Please stop saying this, it is just not true at all, and never has been.

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-07-11 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-10  4:11 [PATCH] Clean up old names in tty code to current names Jon Smirl
2006-07-10  4:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-10  7:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-10  9:44 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 12:41   ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 13:10     ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 13:03       ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 13:12         ` CaT
2006-07-10 13:18           ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 13:43         ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 14:07           ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 14:17             ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-10 14:37             ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 14:42             ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 14:57               ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 15:19                 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 15:10                   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-07-10 15:21                     ` Russell King
2006-07-10 15:38                       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-07-10 15:35                   ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 15:54                     ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 16:04                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-10 22:14                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-10 18:13               ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-11 21:54             ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-07-11 21:52     ` Greg KH
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-11  2:18 Albert Cahalan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060711215422.GB663@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox