From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932503AbWGMEui (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:50:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932504AbWGMEui (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:50:38 -0400 Received: from host36-195-149-62.serverdedicati.aruba.it ([62.149.195.36]:18365 "EHLO mx.cpushare.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932503AbWGMEug (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:50:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 06:51:30 +0200 From: andrea@cpushare.com To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar , Alan Cox , Arjan van de Ven , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Lee Revell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox Subject: Re: [patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n Message-ID: <20060713045130.GA28310@opteron.random> References: <20060630014050.GI19712@stusta.de> <20060712210732.GA10182@elte.hu> <200607130006.12705.ak@suse.de> <20060713030402.GC9102@opteron.random> <20060713044053.GE9102@opteron.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060713044053.GE9102@opteron.random> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I sent the previous email from suse.de but like for the previous emails in this thread, I was only speaking for myself. I followup myself to specify this explicitly because if I did any major or minor mistake in my reasoning in this thread, I want to be clear that you must only blame me personally. The previous from got automatically caught up by the reply headers.