public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@us.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	akpm@osdl.org, achirica@users.sourceforge.net,
	"David C. Hansen" <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
	serue@us.ibm.com, clg@fr.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: airo.c
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:00:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060713230018.GA24359@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060713212824.GA14729@infradead.org>

Christoph Hellwig [hch@infradead.org] wrote:
| On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:53:19PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| > Andrew,
| > 
| > Javier Achirica, one of the major contributors to drivers/net/wireless/airo.c
| > took a look at this patch, and doesn't have any problems with it. It doesn't
| > fix any bugs and is just a cleanup, so it certainly isn't a candidate
| > for this mainline cycle
| 
| I'm not sure it's that easy.  I think it needs some more love:
| 
|  - switch to wake_uo_process
|  - kill JOB_DIE
|  - cleanup a the convoluted mess in airo_thread a bit
| 
| Note that it's still reimplementing the single threaded workqueue
| functionality quite badly.  So if someone could switch it over and while
| we're at it try to kill the idiociy of doing the trylock in the calling
| context and only then calling the thread by always calling the thread
| (which also solves the synchronization problem).
| 
| Anywhy, here's a small incremental patch ontop of yours to implement my
| above items:

I had a quick look at your patch and looks fine to me. I agree we could
do more to clean up the driver.

My inital goal was to  replace kernel_thread() with kthread_*(). So can I
assume you are ok with my patch and that it can go in as is ?

Suka

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-13 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-13 20:53 [PATCH] kthread: airo.c Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2006-07-13 21:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-07-13 23:00   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
2006-07-14 14:35     ` John W. Linville
2006-07-24 18:13 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2006-07-26  6:18   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060713230018.GA24359@us.ibm.com \
    --to=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=achirica@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clg@fr.ibm.com \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox